Beta 4.50.4 released -- faster than 4.49

[Adri Koppes]

Hi Raymond,

> From: MailScanner mailing list 
> [mailto:MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of Raymond Dijkxhoorn
> Sent: donderdag 5 januari 2006 14:01
> To: MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> Subject: Re: Beta 4.50.4 released -- faster than 4.49
> 
> Hi!
> 
> > Something else you might consider implementing, is not to cache or 
> > cache with a low timeout, the results when the message is 
> auto-learned 
> > by Since bayes has learned from the message, it will 
> probably affect 
> > the score of the next message, unless the score is already 
> > sufficiently high enough or low enough for the spam result not be 
> > affected by a diffirent bayes score.
> 
> Same idea as with URIBL, most likely low spam will be auto 
> added to SURBL pretty fast after detection, most of the time 
> within 5-10 mins.

Problem with URIBL is MailScanner has no idea if and when SURBL will add
those!
With bayes, MailScanner know if SA has auto-learned the message.
Only option I see is to add messages without any URIBL hits with a lower
timeout then messages which have already had one or more URIBL hits in
their SA-score.
Same could probably be done with RBL hits.

Adri.

------------------------ MailScanner list ------------------------
To unsubscribe, email jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk with the words:
'leave mailscanner' in the body of the email.
Before posting, read the Wiki (http://wiki.mailscanner.info/) and
the archives (http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html).

Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!