Beta 4.50.4 released -- faster than 4.49
Raymond Dijkxhoorn
raymond at PROLOCATION.NET
Thu Jan 5 13:09:10 GMT 2006
Hi!
>> Same idea as with URIBL, most likely low spam will be auto
>> added to SURBL pretty fast after detection, most of the time
>> within 5-10 mins.
> Problem with URIBL is MailScanner has no idea if and when SURBL will add
> those!
> With bayes, MailScanner know if SA has auto-learned the message.
> Only option I see is to add messages without any URIBL hits with a lower
> timeout then messages which have already had one or more URIBL hits in
> their SA-score. Same could probably be done with RBL hits.
Its in my eyes again comming to the same basic point, low spam you want to
do different things with, so the score can reach the high value in some
time. Bayes is one of them...
Bye,
Raymond.
------------------------ MailScanner list ------------------------
To unsubscribe, email jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk with the words:
'leave mailscanner' in the body of the email.
Before posting, read the Wiki (http://wiki.mailscanner.info/) and
the archives (http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html).
Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list