agains mailscanner

[Drew Marshall]

On 11 Aug 2006, at 22:45, Octavio wrote:

> Hi, as many of you Im on the postfix list too, I
> notice that most of the user of this list prefer
> amavis-new and recently I see that some of them dont
> recoment MailScanner with postfix because it has
> several fails like lost and damage messages?
>
> I use MailScanner in several severs without these kind
> of problems. do you have any idea why some people
> think so?

I think this sums it up really http://wiki.mailscanner.info/doku.php? 
id=documentation:configuration:mta:postfix:politics

It's all about 'That's not the way I intended it to work'. Followed  
by 'I'm right and you are wrong 'cause it's my code' type attitudes.

Bottom line is it works and without mangling, truncating or causing  
the recipient to catch some nasty disease. Although much claimed, so  
far 2.3.x has not broken MS either...

Drew

-- 
In line with our policy, this message has 
been scanned for viruses and dangerous 
content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
www.themarshalls.co.uk/policy