4.35.3 working okay?

[Denis Beauchemin]

<x-flowed>
Julian Field wrote:

> At 18:43 12/10/2004, you wrote:
>
>> Julian Field wrote:
>> > With the Conf vs Config typo corrected, is 4.35.3 working okay for
>> > the brave few of you who have tried it? I haven't heard any more
>> > reports of problems, so hopefully it is alright.
>> >
>> > The next beta will have the phishing detector in it. I have been
>> > running this here today and it has already caught a whole load of
>> > attacks against Abbey National and SunTrust bank customers.
>> >
>> > Your comments please...
>> >
>> > Thanks folks, particularly for being so patient while I get these
>> > nasty Perl dependency and packaging problems sorted out.
>> >
>> > Jules.
>>
>> What is the default action associated with phishing schemes?  Spam, High
>> Scoring Spam, mail bomb 'em (just kidding!)?
>
>
> It inserts a warning right next to the link, telling you (a) that
> MailScanner found a suspicious link and (b) the real target of the link.
> The link itself is left active, so you can click on it if it is a 
> false alarm.
> The subject line is also tagged as containing dangerous content.
>

Julian,

Do we need a new translation for the subject tag or are you using an 
existing one?

Denis

-- 
   _
  °v°   Denis Beauchemin, analyste
 /(_)\  Université de Sherbrooke, S.T.I.
  ^ ^   T: 819.821.8000x2252 F: 819.821.8045

------------------------ MailScanner list ------------------------
To unsubscribe, email jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk with the words:
'leave mailscanner' in the body of the email.
Before posting, read the MAQ (http://www.mailscanner.biz/maq/) and
the archives (http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html).

</x-flowed>