4.35.3 working okay?

[Julian Field]

<x-flowed>
At 19:02 12/10/2004, you wrote:
>Julian Field wrote:
>>At 18:43 12/10/2004, you wrote:
>>>Julian Field wrote:
>>> > With the Conf vs Config typo corrected, is 4.35.3 working okay for
>>> > the brave few of you who have tried it? I haven't heard any more
>>> > reports of problems, so hopefully it is alright.
>>> >
>>> > The next beta will have the phishing detector in it. I have been
>>> > running this here today and it has already caught a whole load of
>>> > attacks against Abbey National and SunTrust bank customers.
>>> >
>>> > Your comments please...
>>> >
>>> > Thanks folks, particularly for being so patient while I get these
>>> > nasty Perl dependency and packaging problems sorted out.
>>> >
>>> > Jules.
>>>
>>>What is the default action associated with phishing schemes?  Spam, High
>>>Scoring Spam, mail bomb 'em (just kidding!)?
>>
>>
>>It inserts a warning right next to the link, telling you (a) that
>>MailScanner found a suspicious link and (b) the real target of the link.
>>The link itself is left active, so you can click on it if it is a false
>>alarm.
>>The subject line is also tagged as containing dangerous content.
>
>Julian,
>
>Do we need a new translation for the subject tag or are you using an
>existing one?

I'm just using the Dangerous Content subject tag. I didn't feel like adding
all the code to add yet another infection report type just for this.
--
Julian Field
www.MailScanner.info
Professional Support Services at www.MailScanner.biz
MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support
Buy the MailScanner book at www.MailScanner.info/store

PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC 7222 11F6 5947 1415 B654

------------------------ MailScanner list ------------------------
To unsubscribe, email jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk with the words:
'leave mailscanner' in the body of the email.
Before posting, read the MAQ (http://www.mailscanner.biz/maq/) and
the archives (http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html).
</x-flowed>