mail without Subject:

[Chris W. Parker]

Rick Cooper <mailto:rcooper at DWFORD.COM>
    on Monday, May 24, 2004 9:56 AM said:

> without seeing the full rule/description/score I would guess a
> spelling error in the score line since 1.0 would be the default if no
> score designation matched

well you deserve a gold star next to your name!

this is what my score looked like when i was done:

body     BLANK_SUBJECT /^\s*$/
describe No subject
score    2.0

this is what it SHOULD have looked like:

body     BLANK_SUBJECT /^\s*$/
describe BLANK_SUBJECT No subject
score    BLANK_SUBJECT 2.0

now it's working fine.

thanks!!
chris.

-------------------------- MailScanner list ----------------------
To leave, send    leave mailscanner    to jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk
Before posting, please see the Most Asked Questions at
http://www.mailscanner.biz/maq/     and the archives at
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html