splitting messages/duplicate messages - was Re: Upgrade Oddity -
Julian Field
mailscanner at ecs.soton.ac.uk
Sat Mar 6 11:08:00 GMT 2004
Some good ideas in there...
At 19:06 05/03/2004, you wrote:
>References:
><9BDD6D4AD0795C46974D7D46C17883B809FC3C13 at ahm_exchange2.americanhm.com>
><4048BDB9.8060203 at pacific.net> <2D63C1DA-6ED4-11D8-B24D-003065F939FE at ucsc.edu>
>In-Reply-To: <2D63C1DA-6ED4-11D8-B24D-003065F939FE at ucsc.edu>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.38
>
>
>I was referring to the explosion of message parts, not archives.
>
>I'd like to see a setting for max part explosion too, or something like
>that, though I'm not sure exactly how all the code in Message.pm works,
>so it's a bit unclear to me if that's possible or a good idea.
>
>Our problem is compounded by the fact that we split recipients in
>sendmail, so if a message comes in with 10 recipients, it's split into
>10 messages. If it also contains 5 poorly formed mime parts, MailScanner
>4.26.7+ will split it up again. So we end up passing 5 parts of 1
>message to SpamAssassin 10 times = 50x. :-(
>
>It would be nice if there was a way for SA to checksum a message, store
>it's SA score and apply that score to subsequent duplicate copies that
>pass through SA within a limited amount of time. This would help with
>dictionary attacks too.
>
>Anyone working on such a thing?
>Does it make sense?
>Thanks,
>
>Ken A.
>Pacific.Net
>
>
>John Rudd wrote:
>
> > On Mar 5, 2004, at 9:49 AM, Ken Anderson (Pacific Internet) wrote:
> >
> >> We process about 3x the amount of mail on a similar machine, and are
> >> unable to run 4.26.8-1. Changes in Message.pm, particularly in it's
> >> expansion of message parts make it slower than previous versions. It's
> >> much better at detecting viruses hidden in poorly formed mime parts, so
> >> it's a problem I'm hoping for a solution to as well.
> >
> >
> > Does it help if you set the maximum archive depth to 0, or are you not
> > talking about expansion of archives, but expansion of something else?
> >
> >
--
Julian Field
www.MailScanner.info
Professional Support Services at www.MailScanner.biz
MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support
PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC 7222 11F6 5947 1415 B654
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list