uuencoded files (was Re: Problem with inline attachments?)

[Mariano Absatz]

Hi Julian,

this comes from the SpamAssassin list... I wonder if MailScanner finds and 
scans files uuencoded within a message...

El 29 Jun 2004 a las 17:34, Theo Van Dinter escribió:

> On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 04:21:09PM -0400, Ryan Moore wrote:
> > I guess what I'm wondering is that is SA not able/designed to recognize 
> > UUencoded attachments? If not, then I guess I should modify the 
> 
> As an FYI: that's not a uuencoded _attachment_.  "attachment" implies
> a MIME part (and if you're doing mime, you'd use base64...)  it's an
> uuencoded inline file.
> 
> SA doesn't do anything special with inline uuencoded parts, it just
> treats
> it as message text.  SA appropriately disregards binary MIME parts
> though.
> 
> For more information, Bugzilla 3278 covered this a bit:
> http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3278

--
Mariano Absatz
El Baby
----------------------------------------------------------
Daddy, what does FORMATTING DRIVE C mean?

-------------------------- MailScanner list ----------------------
To leave, send    leave mailscanner    to jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk
Before posting, please see the Most Asked Questions at
http://www.mailscanner.biz/maq/     and the archives at
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html