Locking/bayes problem : still

[Peter Bonivart]

Robert Mena wrote:
> A couple of days ago I've sent one email about how
> slow my system started to run and how I solved by
> simply removing the bayes db.
>
> I saw one post about it (with a same here situation)
> but no actual solution. One suggested to put the bayes
> db in a tmpfs.
>
> I was wondering how many do use mailscanner+sa (with
> bayes db) and how they solved/addressed this. I don't
> think I affects just 2 systems (mine and the one who
> answered my post).

What version of MS do you have? Are you using the expire functionality
in MS or in SA or on your own?

Please read these for reference:

http://www.sng.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailscanner/serve/cache/303.html
http://www.sng.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailscanner/serve/cache/317.html

I haven't had any bayes problems since January and it's very accurate
even without extra training.

--
/Peter Bonivart

--Unix lovers do it in the Sun

Sun Fire V210, Solaris 9, Sendmail 8.12.10, MailScanner 4.29.7,
SpamAssassin 2.63 + DCC 1.2.45, ClamAV 0.70 + GMP 4.1.2, Vispan 1.4

-------------------------- MailScanner list ----------------------
To leave, send    leave mailscanner    to jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk
Before posting, please see the Most Asked Questions at
http://www.mailscanner.biz/maq/     and the archives at
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html