SpamCopURI-0.19 seems broken

Martin Hepworth martinh at SOLID-STATE-LOGIC.COM
Tue Jul 27 09:19:25 IST 2004


Gerry

you don't need spamcop_uri plugin in SA 3.0 - it's included..the syntax
is kinda different for the uri rules though.

May I recommend you ask on the SA-users list for the correct 3.0 syntax.


--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300


Gerry Doris wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-07-26 at 15:08, Jeff A. Earickson wrote:
>
>>Gang,
>>    I've been following the "BigEvil and Stuff" thread, and I too have been having
>>issues with SpamCopURI-0.19, eval: complaints and open_redirect_list complaints.
>>My setup: Solaris 9, SA 2.63, URI-1.31 (also tried 1.30), MS 4.31.6.
>>And perl 5.8.4: osname=solaris, osvers=2.9, archname=sun4-solaris-thread-multi
>>
>>I downloaded Steve Swaney's version from http://www.fsl.com/support/
>>and followed the instructions, including cleaning out my copies of backhair,
>>bigevil, etc from my /etc/mail/spamassassin directory.  My lint output from
>>"spamassassin -D -p /etc/mail/spamassassin --lint" gives garbage like:
>>
>>Failed to parse line in SpamAssassin configuration, skipping: open_redirect_list
>>_spamcop_uri   snurl.com              *.snurl.com
>>(etc)
>>
>>and
>>
>>Failed to compile URI SpamAssassin tests, skipping:
>>     (syntax error at /etc/mail/spamassassin/surbl_uri.cf, rule SPAMCOP_URI_RBL,
>>line 1, near "eval:"
>>syntax error at /etc/mail/spamassassin/surbl_uri.cf, rule OB_URI_RBL, line 1, ne
>>ar "eval:"
>>syntax error at /etc/mail/spamassassin/surbl_uri.cf, rule OB_URI_RBL, line 9, ne
>>ar "}
>>     }"
>>)
>>
>>Following the advice of the list, I commented out the open_redirect lines, and
>>removed the "eval:" stuff in surbl_uri.cf to shut up these complaints.
>>
>>However -- I'm not convinced that this is the correct fix.  I did this on Friday
>>night and I got a TON of spam over the weekend.  Way more than usual.  Methinks
>>SpamCopURI-0.19 is useless, or neutered by the changes to surbl_uri.cf.
>>
>>How to *really* fix these errors???
>>
>>Jeff Earickson
>>Colby College
>
>
> I had the same error messages and was the one that commented out "eval:"
> to get it to stop complaining.  However, while that stopped the error
> messages SpamCopURI didn't seem to be working.
>
> I went back and reinstalled SA 2.63 and the two perl modules in Steve's
> message.  That fixed things.  I put the "eval:" line back in and
> uncommented the redirect lines.  All ran without complaints and I
> started seeing SA reports with SpamCopURI scores.
>
> --
> Gerry Doris <gdoris at rogers.com>
>
> -------------------------- MailScanner list ----------------------
> To leave, send    leave mailscanner    to jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk
> Before posting, please see the Most Asked Questions at
> http://www.mailscanner.biz/maq/     and the archives at
> http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html
>

**********************************************************************

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.

This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept
for the presence of computer viruses and is believed to be clean.

**********************************************************************

-------------------------- MailScanner list ----------------------
To leave, send    leave mailscanner    to jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk
Before posting, please see the Most Asked Questions at
http://www.mailscanner.biz/maq/     and the archives at
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html



More information about the MailScanner mailing list