Suggestion box re spam scores

[Denis Beauchemin]

Julian Field wrote:

> In which case, so as not to confuse most people with an option they don't
> understand, how about we settle on
> %04.1f
> which should give
> 04.1
> for example.
>
> Does that sound okay to most of you?
>

Julian (I will try not to make a typo in your name twice in a row; I 
wouldn't want to get on your black list ;-)),

It's fine for me but someone said they may prefer %05.1f (such as 009.5) 
just in case some spam scores really high.

Denis
PS: maybe you could stick with your initial idea of a modifiable format 
string.  Just giving a couple of examples in the conf file should allow 
everyone to tailor this to their liking...

-- 
   _
  °v°   Denis Beauchemin, analyste
 /(_)\  Université de Sherbrooke, S.T.I.
  ^ ^   T: 819.821.8000x2252 F: 819.821.8045

-------------------------- MailScanner list ----------------------
To leave, send    leave mailscanner    to jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk
Before posting, please see the Most Asked Questions at
http://www.mailscanner.biz/maq/     and the archives at
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html