Anyone running big SPARC boxes?

David H. dh at UPTIME.AT
Wed Jul 7 22:58:59 IST 2004


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160

Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:

| Hi!
|
|
|>For a 4-way system look at the V440, it's much cheaper than the other
|>4-way system, the V480 and performs about the same. All these cheaper
|>Sun's have smaller on board caches but still large compared to PC HW.
|>
|>After this it becomes not so cheap any more (V880 and up) so I would
|>recommend multiple servers of the above models before a bigger iron.
|>Always easier to upgrade the software with redundant servers than one
|>big one anyway.
|
|
| We did mailscanning with a V880, one iof the bigger SUN boxes, but
| replaces it with a dual xeon. Its simply a waste of money to do scanning
| on SPARC systems.
|
Amen.

(Sorry could not resist)

- -d
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.3.6 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFA7HIjPMoaMn4kKR4RAzwfAJ9s+Q6pjTFNdTJpITbnIzUv4MJbfwCfekRN
hSA8qobIJoFyNb9x3ICFqPA=
=tr1V
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-------------------------- MailScanner list ----------------------
To leave, send    leave mailscanner    to jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk
Before posting, please see the Most Asked Questions at
http://www.mailscanner.biz/maq/     and the archives at
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html



More information about the MailScanner mailing list