SV: rant about anti-virus and spam, MS flamed
Anders Andersson, IT
anders.andersson at LTKALMAR.SE
Thu Jan 29 08:22:39 GMT 2004
> -----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
> Från: Matt Kettler [mailto:mkettler at EVI-INC.COM]
> Skickat: den 29 januari 2004 00:37
> Till: MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> Ämne: Re: rant about anti-virus and spam, MS flamed
> At 06:09 PM 1/28/2004, Leonard Hermens wrote:
> > >Can you cite an example of when, at the present time, it is a good
> > >idea to have a mailserver configured to auto respond to a
> sender and
> > >notify them that a message sent contained a live virus infection?
> >Any virus or macro virus that is sent manually by the sender.
> I'll agree that is a particular email where it is good for a
> server to autorespond.
> However, that's not an answer to the question.
As long as mailscanner will first scan for virus before it scans for file
types/names I dont mind if auto-responses are turned of for viruses. Maybe
its already doing that when I think about it?
> A mailserver can't be configured to tell the difference
> between a manual send and an automated one, so your example
> is a single isolated email example. I'm asking for a
> situation where it's a good idea to configure your mailserver
> in such a manner, not a single message case.
> Real world, real mailserver, present time, realistic
> situation where it would be a good idea to have a server do
> this. (ie: how can you do it on an automated basis without
> inflicting casualties, and still reap some useful
More information about the MailScanner