Whitelist vs Spam List Precedence

[Mike McMullen]

----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Bonivart" <peter at UCGBOOK.COM>
To: <MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK>
Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2004 2:52 PM
Subject: Re: Whitelist vs Spam List Precedence


> Mike McMullen wrote:
> > I checked that. The real sender address is what is whitelisted. I even
> > checked through a few days back of logs and see entries in mailscanner
> > for it being whitelisted and getting a score of -98. Then last night after
> > the mail server is listed in ORDB, the only message listed is message
> > stating it's in ORDB and is marked as spam.
>
> Looks to me you're whitelisting in SA, don't do that, do it in MS
> instead. It will override everything. If you use RBL in MS and whitelist
> in SA it will not work.
>
> Use this:
>
> Is Definitely Not Spam = %rules-dir%/spam.whitelist.rules
>
> And insert the addresses there as yes and with a default as no.
>

Hi Peter,

Thanks. I think that will do it.

Mike

-------------------------- MailScanner list ----------------------
To leave, send    leave mailscanner    to jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk
For further info about MailScanner, please see the Most Asked
Questions at    http://www.mailscanner.biz/maq/     and the archives
at    http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html