spamassassin tests
Derek Winkler
dwinkler at ALGORITHMICS.COM
Wed Apr 21 14:58:52 IST 2004
You're talking about two different things here.
Filenames such as this are probably being blocked by the "Deny all other
double file extensions. This catches any hidden filenames." rule which is
last in the default filename rules.
It should be safe to completely disable this rule or add rules before it
which allow .doc files.
allow \.doc$ - -
If you include the headers from a message identified as spam when it
shouldn't have been we can maybe help you out with reducing the false
positives.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: InvictaWiz Customer Support [mailto:martyn at INVICTAWIZ.COM]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2004 2:41 AM
> To: MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> Subject: spamassassin tests
>
>
> Is it possible to reduce the number/depth of tests for emails
> to specific domains?
>
> We have several customers who operate recruitment agencies.
> They each receive a lot of emails from
> candidates using hotmail, yahoo, mail.com etc addresses and
> who seem unable to send emails without
> using long and stupid names such as "my.cv.for.you.wps.doc.doc.cv.doc"
> The messages nearly always fall foul of the NJABL and other
> dialup tests, and the filename tests.
>
> Can anyone suggest any ways to lessen the number of false
> positives on these without increasing
> false negatives for everone else?
>
>
> Martyn Routley
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------------
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by the http://www.anti84787.com
> MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------------
>
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list