MS 4.23-11: SA no go

Julian Field mailscanner at ecs.soton.ac.uk
Wed Sep 10 13:14:13 IST 2003


MCP doesn't work if SpamAssassin is enabled.
I have yet to work out why...

At 03:45 10/09/2003, you wrote:
>I've just tried this on a RH8 box and it works fine. The only thing changed
>between the 2 versions of the SA support in MailScanner is that the "Max
>SpamAssassin Size" check causes the message to be truncated rather than
>ignored. So big spam doesn't evade the check completely, it just gets its
>end chopped off.
>
>I haven't had a chance to install it all on Solaris 9 yet. I've got a Sun
>in my office back home, I must get around to updating that to Solaris 9
>(assuming I can find the media, we have a site licence).
>
>Can you put through it the 2 sample messages supplied with SpamAssassin
>(sample-nonspam.txt and sample-spam.txt) and show me all the MailScanner
>headers you get please. Would be worth setting "Always Include SpamAssassin
>Report = yes" as well, so we can see what happens to the non-spam example.
>
>At 03:21 10/09/2003, you wrote:
>>Julian,
>>
>>It is late at night, and I haven't investigated, but SA 2.60
>>seems to have quit after I upgraded to 4.23-11.  SA works fine
>>4.22-5, so I have dropped back to that.  I didn't notice that SA
>>wasn't there for a day with 4.23-11.  Setup: Solaris 9, both
>>SA 2.60 and MS installed from tarballs, Razor, sendmail.
>>The output of "spamassassin -D --lint" looks normal to me.
>>Any ideas?  The 4.23-11 conf file says to use SA (checked the
>>conf file, and it looks right).  Hmmm...
>>
>>--- Jeff Earickson
>
>--
>Julian Field
>www.MailScanner.info
>Professional Support Services at www.MailScanner.biz
>MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support

--
Julian Field
www.MailScanner.info
Professional Support Services at www.MailScanner.biz
MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support



More information about the MailScanner mailing list