Performance question
Alan Fiebig
mailscanner at ELKNET.NET
Thu Oct 9 17:29:29 IST 2003
>Actual number of processors. If you have too many children per CPU then
>the OS will waste too much time on context switching and scheduling. I
>wouldn't run more than four per CPU, and less if you are restricted by
>the amount of RAM in the machine.
Thanks! Helps a lot :)
Now, that leads me to wonder...
What effect do:
Max Unscanned Messages Per Scan
Max Unsafe Messages Per Scan
have on CPU, RAM, and IO usage?
Is it better to have a smaller batch that runs more often,
or a big batch that takes longer?
If the in queue has 1,000 messages waiting to be processed,
I've never understood the difference between:
5 children performing a total of 10 batches of 100 messages each
vs.
5 children performing a total of 100 batches of 10 messages each
-Alan
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list