OT : Clarkconnect

[Erik Jakobsen]

Ugo Bellavance wrote:
>>>>Then there never can be
>>>>anything to claim on.
>>>
>>>
>>>What kind of claim?  the SCO-kind of claim?  Unlikely to
>>
>>hit you, since you use it as personal.  However, it would hit
>>you even if you paid, because what you paid for is for
>>Clarkconnect's value added, and you're still using a linux
>>kernel.  However, since you can get support because you paid,
>>this is fine.
>>
>>The come on punish me & Clarkconnect where I purchased it.
>>
>
>
> I don't want to punish you
>
>
>>Ohh is this a criminal court ?.
>>
>
>
> Not at all.
>
>
>>Will not discuss this anymore, and I don't know why you are done that
>>attack against me.
>
>
> I'm not attacking you.  You may think I am, but I'm not.
> I just think you have a mislead conception of licences.  I wanted you to correct this, but since you don't want to, I won't and you're right, it isn't the place to go further.
>
>
>>This is OT, and this place is not a discussion_club to discuss such
>>things, and over and out with it.
>>
>>
>>>>As I am not using it for professional
>>>>use, it was
>>>>available for a fair price.
>>>
>>>
>>>Then everything is fine :)
>>>
>>>
>>
>>You are not easy to understand, but never mind.
>
>
> I meant: you comply with ClarkConnect's License.
>
>
>>Will not discuss it more.
>>--
>
>
> Ok.
>
>
>>/Erik
>>
>
>
> Ugo
>
>
The final words from here. Ask Clarkconnect. I have told them, that I've
been treated for using a licensed CC2.0, but that they have to discuss
any problems with you.

FINAL.

Sorry you good people of this board. I think there's a person, that
needs to apollogies for his use ot the bandwith of the MailScanner
mailinglist.

And with this dear members, these were my final words to the subject.
--

/Erik