Spam notice

[Julian Field]

At 17:46 07/11/2003, you wrote:
> > -----Message d'origine-----
> > De : ian douglas [mailto:id at W98.US]
> > Envoyé : Friday, November 07, 2003 12:32 PM
> > À : MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> > Objet : Re: Spam notice
> >
> >
> > Problem with digests, as experienced in the past with web hosting and
> > setting up Email mailing lists, is that HTML Emails cause a lot of
> > headaches. The digest mode would have to strip HTML or save it as
> > text/plain - otherwise badly-written HTML could make an
> > archive really hard
> > to read, if readable at all, embedded styles, etc., could
> > make even the
> > prettiest HTML documents look horrendous.
> >
> > Just my $0.02 worth, but yes, I support this idea. I have one
> > user (who gets
> > 50% of all spam collected on my system of dozens of domains
> > hosted) who is
> > particularly paranoid about FP's and losing legit Email.
> >
> > -id
>
>To me, a plain-text digest containing info about the message would be 
>sufficient.
>Example:
>
>You received 3 messages that were considered as Spam by MailScanner and 
>quarantined, here is the list:
>
>Message 1:
>
>From:
>To:
>Subject:
>Spam score:
>Time/Date:
>To have this message released from quarantine, send this info to your Mail 
>Admin:
>/path/to/message
>
>So on..
>
>Any other ideas?

Sorry to pass the buck on this one, but would this be better implemented in 
MailWatch? It's an archiving and log analysis problem, not a mail scanning 
problem.
Steve -- what do you think?E
-- 
Julian Field
www.MailScanner.info
Professional Support Services at www.MailScanner.biz
MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support
PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC  7222 11F6 5947 1415 B654