[SAtalk] Am I nuts

Chris Barnes cHRis-BarNeS at tAMu.eDu
Mon Nov 3 22:14:13 GMT 2003

Background: I had SpamAssassin 2.60 running just fine (using sendmail).
I was calling spamd via the /etc/procmail.

After installing Mailscanner and ClamAV, I noticed that the original SA
conf file was being ignored in favor of the smaller version in the
Mailscanner conf file.  Since I have custom rules that I really didn't
want to loose, I turned SA off in Mailscanner, letting it handle just
the the running of ClamAV.  SA is still being called by procmail.

It seems to work just fine (everything).

Q: Is this a "wrong way" to do it (ie. performance issues)?

Q: Is it just a "wierd way"?


+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Chris Barnes                                       AOL IM: CNBarnes
chris-barnes at tamu.edu                            Yahoo IM: chrisnbarnes
Computer Systems Manager                               ph: 979-845-7801
Department of Physics                                 fax: 979-845-2590
Texas A&M University

This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
help you create better code?   SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
Spamassassin-talk at lists.sourceforge.net

More information about the MailScanner mailing list