Question about spam.actions.rules (Update)

Max Kipness mkipness at GENIANT.COM
Tue Jun 17 00:33:47 IST 2003


I would also move HighScoreSpamActions, correct?

Thanks,
Max

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Julian Field [mailto:mailscanner at ECS.SOTON.AC.UK] 
> Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 1:04 PM
> To: MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> Subject: Re: Question about spam.actions.rules (Update)
> 
> 
> At 18:03 16/06/2003, you wrote:
> >Seems like it doesn't work regardles of whether I add the individual 
> >email addresses before or after the entire domain rule. It's 
> processing 
> >both. Anyway around this?
> 
> A quick hack is to edit 
> /usr/lib/MailScanner/MailScanner/ConfigDefs.pl.
> Look for the "SpamActions" line (note it is very long). It is 
> currently in the "[All,YesNo]" section. Move it to the 
> "[First,YesNo]" section.
> 
> Then restart MailScanner.
> 
> Anyone got any objections to me making this change in the 
> main distribution? Or are there loads of you about there 
> using the "all matching rules" feature of Spam Actions rulesets?
> 
> >Hello -
> >
> >I'm trying to deliver to certain domains, but not to certain 
> >individuals at a domain. I have one person that does not want to 
> >receive tagged email, all the others do.
> >
> >Is this the right order to achieve this? Or should I have the 
> >individual at the bottom of the list:
> >
> >To:     user1 at domain1.com               delete
> >To:     user2 at domain1.com               delete
> >
> >To:     *@domain2.com           forward spam at domain2.com
> >To:     *@domain1.com           deliver
> >FromOrTo:       default         deliver
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Max
> 
> --
> Julian Field
> www.MailScanner.info
> Professional Support Services at www.MailScanner.biz 
> MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support
> 




More information about the MailScanner mailing list