Question about spam.actions.rules (Update)
Max Kipness
mkipness at GENIANT.COM
Tue Jun 17 00:33:47 IST 2003
I would also move HighScoreSpamActions, correct?
Thanks,
Max
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Julian Field [mailto:mailscanner at ECS.SOTON.AC.UK]
> Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 1:04 PM
> To: MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> Subject: Re: Question about spam.actions.rules (Update)
>
>
> At 18:03 16/06/2003, you wrote:
> >Seems like it doesn't work regardles of whether I add the individual
> >email addresses before or after the entire domain rule. It's
> processing
> >both. Anyway around this?
>
> A quick hack is to edit
> /usr/lib/MailScanner/MailScanner/ConfigDefs.pl.
> Look for the "SpamActions" line (note it is very long). It is
> currently in the "[All,YesNo]" section. Move it to the
> "[First,YesNo]" section.
>
> Then restart MailScanner.
>
> Anyone got any objections to me making this change in the
> main distribution? Or are there loads of you about there
> using the "all matching rules" feature of Spam Actions rulesets?
>
> >Hello -
> >
> >I'm trying to deliver to certain domains, but not to certain
> >individuals at a domain. I have one person that does not want to
> >receive tagged email, all the others do.
> >
> >Is this the right order to achieve this? Or should I have the
> >individual at the bottom of the list:
> >
> >To: user1 at domain1.com delete
> >To: user2 at domain1.com delete
> >
> >To: *@domain2.com forward spam at domain2.com
> >To: *@domain1.com deliver
> >FromOrTo: default deliver
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Max
>
> --
> Julian Field
> www.MailScanner.info
> Professional Support Services at www.MailScanner.biz
> MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support
>
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list