SENTINIX Postfix+MailScanner+SpamAssassin
David H.
dh at UPTIME.AT
Tue Dec 2 17:22:32 GMT 2003
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160
Michel (by way of Michel ) wrote:
<snip>
> I do now consider changing MTA.... I'm orginally a "Sendmail-guy" but would
> like to test Exim or Zmailer before falling back to Sendmail
I am a sendmail guy as well (and happy with it :P) but currently
evaluating Exim + MailScanner, which seems to work fine too.
(if). Julian
> recommended Exim, so perhaps that's the logical choice?! *but*, I'm reading
> about some local root exploits for, although earlier versions of, Exim, which
> is why I'm hesitating. :)
Is that Exim3 ?
>
> Preferred MTA? Exim or Zmailer or {insert favourite MTA} ?
>
I'd want
First Choice Sendmail + MailScanner (due to milter support)
Second Choice Exim + MailScanner
> Anyone got good/bad experience of Zmailer + MailScanner ( + SpamAssassin) ??
> On a busy (1000+ e-mails per day) proxy/gateway or server??
1000+ I would not call anywhere near busy ;) One of the Server we have
on sendmail+MailScanner does around 20K a day and is happy. But even
that is a laughable amount of daily mail.
- -d
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (Darwin)
iD8DBQE/zMpdPMoaMn4kKR4RA9ctAJ9P0Ttz87Lc7FG9hG7/emb2/toBTwCfYfF1
i+UAOeXBGUrsI9VipTC7pcw=
=qOvr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list