InfoSecurity show

[Tony Finch]

Kevin Spicer <kevins at BMRB.CO.UK> wrote:
>
>FWIW The main argument I hear for moving to a commercial product is the
>'content filtering' that some of the commercial products claim to do.
>The main reasons for this being HR & legal related (not just porn but
>also profanity, and prevention of information leakage - quite how that
>could be achieved with any degree or certainty). I know all about the
>striphtml action, but that alone isn't seen as being enough.  The other
>'essential requirement' of a content filtering is detailed reporting.

What do you need that a custom SpamAssassin rule with a high score
doesn't provide?

Tony.
--
f.a.n.finch  <dot at dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/
LOUGH FOYLE TO CARLINGFORD LOUGH: SOUTH, BECOMING CYCLONIC, 3 OR 4. SHOWERS.
MODERATE, LOCALLY POOR. SLIGHT.