something else but SpamAssassin

Julian Field mailscanner at ecs.soton.ac.uk
Tue Apr 29 16:57:21 IST 2003


At 08:43 29/04/2003, you wrote:
>On Mon, 28 Apr 2003 14:40:03 +0100, you wrote:
>
> >If possible, I would like to be able to avoid calling another executable
> >and piping a message into it. But if they have to go down that route, there
> >must at the very least be a means of giving it multiple messages. Starting
> >up a program for every single message will be very slow.
>
>Would it be possible to put the messages in a separate directory and
>have the scanner process that directory? A bit like virusscanners.

I would like to avoid having to write out all the messages to disk for the
spam processing if at all possible.
--
Julian Field
www.MailScanner.info
Professional Support Services at www.MailScanner.biz
MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support



More information about the MailScanner mailing list