something else but SpamAssassin

Julian Field mailscanner at
Tue Apr 29 16:57:21 IST 2003

At 08:43 29/04/2003, you wrote:
>On Mon, 28 Apr 2003 14:40:03 +0100, you wrote:
> >If possible, I would like to be able to avoid calling another executable
> >and piping a message into it. But if they have to go down that route, there
> >must at the very least be a means of giving it multiple messages. Starting
> >up a program for every single message will be very slow.
>Would it be possible to put the messages in a separate directory and
>have the scanner process that directory? A bit like virusscanners.

I would like to avoid having to write out all the messages to disk for the
spam processing if at all possible.
Julian Field
Professional Support Services at
MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support

More information about the MailScanner mailing list