Score is -35 but it is still marked as s p a m, why?

Donovan Huff | HUFF DATA SYSTEMS donovan at HUFFDATASYSTEMS.COM
Sun Apr 6 19:09:49 IST 2003


Running the following versions:

Perl v5.6.0
MailScanner 4.13-3
SpamAssassin 2.52


TIA,

Donovan

----- Original Message -----
From: "Julian Field" <mailscanner at ECS.SOTON.AC.UK>
To: <MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK>
Sent: Sunday, April 06, 2003 5:52 AM
Subject: Re: Score is -35 but it is still marked as s p a m, why?


> What version of Perl are you running? There is a Perl bug somewhere around
> this code, I had to write it the way I did because Perl was getting
> arithmetic comparison wrong sometimes.
> What version of MailScanner are you running?
>
> At 07:59 06/04/2003, you wrote:
>
> >I am wondering why messages marked with a score such as -35 are tagged as
> >s p a m in the subject line when the required as 5 and all
> >the header information says it is not s p a m, I have attached the
> >message.  I've had this issue several times and with different
> >MailScanner versions.
> >
> >
> >Regards,
> >
> >Donovan Huff
> >Owner/Operator
> >HUFF DATA SYSTEMS
> >donovan at huffdatasystems.com
> >http://www.huffdatasystems.com/
> >(361) 781-0631
> >
> >------------------------------------------------------
> >Web Hosting Starting at $5.00/mo
> >http://www.huffdatasystems.com/
> >------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >Return-Path: <Motorola-owner at part-15.org>
> >Received: from core.huffdatasystems.net (root at localhost)
> >         by huffdatasystems.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h350nqp27062
> >         for <donovan at huffdatasystems.com>; Fri, 4 Apr 2003 18:49:52 -0600
> >X-ClientAddr: 198.63.203.3
> >Received: from part-15.org (mail.midconqc.com [198.63.203.3])
> >         by core.huffdatasystems.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id h350nlg27050
> >         for <donovan at huffdatasystems.com>; Fri, 4 Apr 2003 18:49:47 -0600
> >Received: from lewis.abi.tconline.net [208.29.17.215] by pdqlink.com with
> >ESMTP
> >   (SMTPD32-4.07) id A788E0013A; Fri, 04 Apr 2003 18:47:04 CDT
> >Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]])
> >         by lewis.abi.tconline.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h350ecB12126
> >         for Motorola at part-15.org; Fri, 4 Apr 2003 18:40:38 -0600
> >Content-Type: text/plain;
> >   charset="iso-8859-1"
> >From: Lewis Bergman <lbergman at wtxs.net>
> >Organization: Texas Communications, Inc.
> >To: Motorola at part-15.org
> >Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 18:40:37 -0600
> >User-Agent: KMail/1.4.1
> >References: <003001c2fb03$77925e70$0200a8c0 at villanova.com>
> >In-Reply-To: <003001c2fb03$77925e70$0200a8c0 at villanova.com>
> >MIME-Version: 1.0
> >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> >Message-Id: <200304041840.37839.lbergman at wtxs.net>
> >Subject: Re: {Spam?} RE: [Motorola] Adjacent towers causing multipath/high
> >noise?
> >Precedence: bulk
> >Sender: Motorola-owner at part-15.org
> >Reply-To: Motorola at part-15.org
> >X-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
> >X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
> >X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-35.1, required 5,
> >         AWL, BAYES_01, IN_REP_TO, NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,
> >         REFERENCES, REPLY_WITH_QUOTES, SIGNATURE_LONG_DENSE, SMTPD_IN_RCVD,
> >         USER_AGENT_KMAIL)
> >Status:
> >
>
> --
> Julian Field
> www.MailScanner.info
> Professional Support Services at www.MailScanner.biz
> MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support



More information about the MailScanner mailing list