Score is -35 but it is still marked as s p a m, why?

[Julian Field]

I don't know of anyone else suffering problems with all mail being marked
as spam, so I suspect it's something in your configuration.
Try upgrading to SpamAssassin 2.53 as well, just in case you are hitting a
bug there.

At 19:09 06/04/2003, you wrote:
>Running the following versions:
>
>Perl v5.6.0
>MailScanner 4.13-3
>SpamAssassin 2.52
>
>
>TIA,
>
>Donovan
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Julian Field" <mailscanner at ECS.SOTON.AC.UK>
>To: <MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK>
>Sent: Sunday, April 06, 2003 5:52 AM
>Subject: Re: Score is -35 but it is still marked as s p a m, why?
>
>
> > What version of Perl are you running? There is a Perl bug somewhere around
> > this code, I had to write it the way I did because Perl was getting
> > arithmetic comparison wrong sometimes.
> > What version of MailScanner are you running?
> >
> > At 07:59 06/04/2003, you wrote:
> >
> > >I am wondering why messages marked with a score such as -35 are tagged as
> > >s p a m in the subject line when the required as 5 and all
> > >the header information says it is not s p a m, I have attached the
> > >message.  I've had this issue several times and with different
> > >MailScanner versions.
> > >
> > >
> > >Regards,
> > >
> > >Donovan Huff
> > >Owner/Operator
> > >HUFF DATA SYSTEMS
> > >donovan at huffdatasystems.com
> > >http://www.huffdatasystems.com/
> > >(361) 781-0631
> > >
> > >------------------------------------------------------
> > >Web Hosting Starting at $5.00/mo
> > >http://www.huffdatasystems.com/
> > >------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > >Return-Path: <Motorola-owner at part-15.org>
> > >Received: from core.huffdatasystems.net (root at localhost)
> > >         by huffdatasystems.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h350nqp27062
> > >         for <donovan at huffdatasystems.com>; Fri, 4 Apr 2003 18:49:52 -0600
> > >X-ClientAddr: 198.63.203.3
> > >Received: from part-15.org (mail.midconqc.com [198.63.203.3])
> > >         by core.huffdatasystems.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id
> h350nlg27050
> > >         for <donovan at huffdatasystems.com>; Fri, 4 Apr 2003 18:49:47 -0600
> > >Received: from lewis.abi.tconline.net [208.29.17.215] by pdqlink.com with
> > >ESMTP
> > >   (SMTPD32-4.07) id A788E0013A; Fri, 04 Apr 2003 18:47:04 CDT
> > >Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]])
> > >         by lewis.abi.tconline.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h350ecB12126
> > >         for Motorola at part-15.org; Fri, 4 Apr 2003 18:40:38 -0600
> > >Content-Type: text/plain;
> > >   charset="iso-8859-1"
> > >From: Lewis Bergman <lbergman at wtxs.net>
> > >Organization: Texas Communications, Inc.
> > >To: Motorola at part-15.org
> > >Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 18:40:37 -0600
> > >User-Agent: KMail/1.4.1
> > >References: <003001c2fb03$77925e70$0200a8c0 at villanova.com>
> > >In-Reply-To: <003001c2fb03$77925e70$0200a8c0 at villanova.com>
> > >MIME-Version: 1.0
> > >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> > >Message-Id: <200304041840.37839.lbergman at wtxs.net>
> > >Subject: Re: {Spam?} RE: [Motorola] Adjacent towers causing multipath/high
> > >noise?
> > >Precedence: bulk
> > >Sender: Motorola-owner at part-15.org
> > >Reply-To: Motorola at part-15.org
> > >X-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
> > >X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
> > >X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-35.1, required 5,
> > >         AWL, BAYES_01, IN_REP_TO, NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,
> > >         REFERENCES, REPLY_WITH_QUOTES, SIGNATURE_LONG_DENSE,
> SMTPD_IN_RCVD,
> > >         USER_AGENT_KMAIL)
> > >Status:
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Julian Field
> > www.MailScanner.info
> > Professional Support Services at www.MailScanner.biz
> > MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support

--
Julian Field
www.MailScanner.info
Professional Support Services at www.MailScanner.biz
MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support