Score is -35 but it is still marked as s p a m, why?

Julian Field mailscanner at ecs.soton.ac.uk
Sun Apr 6 11:52:50 IST 2003


What version of Perl are you running? There is a Perl bug somewhere around
this code, I had to write it the way I did because Perl was getting
arithmetic comparison wrong sometimes.
What version of MailScanner are you running?

At 07:59 06/04/2003, you wrote:

>I am wondering why messages marked with a score such as -35 are tagged as
>s p a m in the subject line when the required as 5 and all
>the header information says it is not s p a m, I have attached the
>message.  I've had this issue several times and with different
>MailScanner versions.
>
>
>Regards,
>
>Donovan Huff
>Owner/Operator
>HUFF DATA SYSTEMS
>donovan at huffdatasystems.com
>http://www.huffdatasystems.com/
>(361) 781-0631
>
>------------------------------------------------------
>Web Hosting Starting at $5.00/mo
>http://www.huffdatasystems.com/
>------------------------------------------------------
>
>Return-Path: <Motorola-owner at part-15.org>
>Received: from core.huffdatasystems.net (root at localhost)
>         by huffdatasystems.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h350nqp27062
>         for <donovan at huffdatasystems.com>; Fri, 4 Apr 2003 18:49:52 -0600
>X-ClientAddr: 198.63.203.3
>Received: from part-15.org (mail.midconqc.com [198.63.203.3])
>         by core.huffdatasystems.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id h350nlg27050
>         for <donovan at huffdatasystems.com>; Fri, 4 Apr 2003 18:49:47 -0600
>Received: from lewis.abi.tconline.net [208.29.17.215] by pdqlink.com with
>ESMTP
>   (SMTPD32-4.07) id A788E0013A; Fri, 04 Apr 2003 18:47:04 CDT
>Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]])
>         by lewis.abi.tconline.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h350ecB12126
>         for Motorola at part-15.org; Fri, 4 Apr 2003 18:40:38 -0600
>Content-Type: text/plain;
>   charset="iso-8859-1"
>From: Lewis Bergman <lbergman at wtxs.net>
>Organization: Texas Communications, Inc.
>To: Motorola at part-15.org
>Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 18:40:37 -0600
>User-Agent: KMail/1.4.1
>References: <003001c2fb03$77925e70$0200a8c0 at villanova.com>
>In-Reply-To: <003001c2fb03$77925e70$0200a8c0 at villanova.com>
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
>Message-Id: <200304041840.37839.lbergman at wtxs.net>
>Subject: Re: {Spam?} RE: [Motorola] Adjacent towers causing multipath/high
>noise?
>Precedence: bulk
>Sender: Motorola-owner at part-15.org
>Reply-To: Motorola at part-15.org
>X-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
>X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
>X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-35.1, required 5,
>         AWL, BAYES_01, IN_REP_TO, NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,
>         REFERENCES, REPLY_WITH_QUOTES, SIGNATURE_LONG_DENSE, SMTPD_IN_RCVD,
>         USER_AGENT_KMAIL)
>Status:
>

--
Julian Field
www.MailScanner.info
Professional Support Services at www.MailScanner.biz
MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support



More information about the MailScanner mailing list