Bayes not working?

[David While]

Not all spam triggers the autolearn. I can't remember what the number is but the spamassassin score has to be above a certain number to trigger the autolearn.

⁣Sent from BlueMail ​

On 14 Sep 2017, 09:24, at 09:24, Mark Meelhuysen <mark at meelhuysen.com> wrote:
>And i was looking but unable to find Bates!! ☺ No, just kidding..
>In my config auto learn is enabled. It is by default.
>I concluded bayes not working as I saw indeed that there are 0 spams in
>the DB.
>The config is running for a couple of days. It detected some spam, does
>that mean that when the system detected 10 e-mails as spam that my
>Bayes DB should contain 10 spam emails?
>
>Van: MailScanner
>[mailto:mailscanner-bounces+mark=meelhuysen.com at lists.mailscanner.info]
>Namens David While
>Verzonden: donderdag 14 september 2017 10:20
>Aan: MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
>Onderwerp: Re: Bayes not working?
>
>Damn autocorrect! Should obviously be Bayes not Bates!!
>Sent from BlueMail<http://www.bluemail.me/r?b=10455>
>On 14 Sep 2017, at 09:18, David While
><dwhile at while.org.uk<mailto:dwhile at while.org.uk>> wrote:
>There appears to be 0 spam emails in the Bates database. Check that you
>have Bates set to autolearn otherwise you will not get any.
>Sent from BlueMail <http://www.bluemail.me/r?b=10455>
>On 14 Sep 2017, at 09:06, Mark Meelhuysen <
>mark at meelhuysen.com<mailto:mark at meelhuysen.com>> wrote:
>Hi All,
>
>
>I noticed that my Bayes DB is not building. My spamassassin –D –lint
>output for bayes:
>
>
>Sep 14 10:02:06.389 [50764] dbg: bayes: tie-ing to DB file R/O
>/etc/MailScanner/bayes/bayes_toks
>Sep 14 10:02:06.389 [50764] dbg: bayes: tie-ing to DB file R/O
>/etc/MailScanner/bayes/bayes_seen
>Sep 14 10:02:06.389 [50764] dbg: bayes: found bayes db version 3
>Sep 14 10:02:06.390 [50764] dbg: bayes: DB journal sync: last sync: 0
>Sep 14 10:02:06.390 [50764] dbg: bayes: not available for scanning,
>only 0 spam(s) in bayes DB < 200
>Sep 14 10:02:06.390 [50764] dbg: bayes: untie-ing
>
>
>Any idea’s where to start looking? Bayes and spamassassin are not
>generating errors in MailScanner –lint and spamassassin –D --lint
>
>
>Met vriendelijke groet,
>
>
>Mark Meelhuysen
>
>
>
>--
>This message has been scanned for viruses and
>dangerous content by MailScanner<http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
>believed to be clean.
>
>
>
>
>
>--
>This message has been scanned for viruses and
>dangerous content by MailScanner<http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
>believed to be clean.
>
>-- 
>This message has been scanned for viruses and
>dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
>believed to be clean.
>
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>-- 
>MailScanner mailing list
>mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
>http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20170914/2bcb4add/attachment.html>