[Question] RE: sending warning message

[Glenn Steen]

Hello Eoin,

Remeber that the handling of the recipient part, the FromOrTo thing in this
case, only looks at the first recipient in multi-recipient mails. You need
configure your mta (incoming, in case you use a multi-mta setup... For
Postfix, the split will happen too late, in a single instance setup, so you
need find/use my very old "two-instance-split-per/recipient" wiki
article... if at all possible... or DIY;-)) to split incoming
e-mails/recipient.

Cheers!
-- 
-- Glenn

2017-01-25 5:22 GMT+01:00 Eoin Kim <Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au>:

> Hello Mark,
>
> That is a good question indeed.
>     - First option is definitely not desired.
>     - Second option looks okay but I guess the other way (From the
> Internet to my company) will be affected as well. I mean it will affect my
> scenario #2.
>     - Third option means dropping the email without any notification?
>
> It is a good question but very hard to determine. Let me think about it.
> Thanks a lot.
>
> Eoin
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: MailScanner [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+eoin.kim=rcst.com.au at lists.
> mailscanner.info] On Behalf Of Mark Sapiro
> Sent: Wednesday, 25 January 2017 2:13 PM
> To: MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
> Subject: Re: [Question] RE: sending warning message
>
> On 01/24/2017 07:54 PM, Eoin Kim wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for your message. Yes, you are right. At the moment, the receiver
> gets an email with an attachment (%org-name%-Attachment-Warning.txt).
> What I want to achieve is sending the message to the sender only because
> it's a sender's fault (e.g. double extension filename). So, it's a bit
> difficult to explain with my limited English but for example, when a
> company user sends an email with double extension filename attachment, then:
> >
> >     MailScanner: hey, you are doing a bad thing (to sender)
> >     MailScanner: hey, he is doing a bad thing to you (to receiver)
> >
> > So, I don't want the second thing to happen. Is it possible? Thanks.
>
>
> What do you want the recipient to get?
>
> 1) A message as sent by the sender with no alteration.
> 2) A message with the attachment removed with no indication or explanation
> of that
> 3) Nothing at all.
>
> I'm not really sure if any of those options can be accomplished. My
> previous suggestion to use a Scan Messages rule set to not scan outbound
> mail will accomplish 1), but won't notify the sender.
>
> In any case, once you clarify what you want the recipient to receive if
> anything, I'll think about ways to accomplish it.
>
> --
> Mark Sapiro <mark at msapiro.net>        The highway is for gamblers,
> San Francisco Bay Area, California    better use your sense - B. Dylan
>
>
> --
> MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>
>
>
> --
> MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>
>


-- 
-- Glenn
email: glenn < dot > steen < at > gmail < dot > com
work: glenn < dot > steen < at > ap1 < dot > se
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20170125/0df19e5f/attachment.html>