SpamAssassin classifies MailScanner reports like SPAM

[Alex Neuman van der Hans]

Good point.

> On Mar 23, 2016, at 10:32 AM, John Wilcock <john at tradoc.fr> wrote:
> 
> But the OP was talking about MailScanner *reports*, which should definitely, IMHO, be properly formed (i.e. RFC-compliant) even if the original message wasn't. 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20160323/05665a0e/attachment.html>