{Spam?} Obvious spam getting through

[Sterling Chavis]

Does Mailscanner have the option to allow the message without checking 
it if it already has X-Mailscanner headers indicating that it's not 
spam? If so what config option is responsible for it?


On 12/14/2016 12:44 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> On 12/14/2016 11:03 AM, Sterling Chavis wrote:
>> The other day I started to get slammed with spam. SpamAssassin was doing
>> a very good job before that, and is still catching many. Couldthey be
>> spoofing the X-Mailscanner headers to bypass my mailscan rules? Here is
>> an example of the ones that are getting through:
>
> Interesting. Your message to the list got blocked as spam by my MailScanner.
>
> X-GPC-MailScanner-SpamCheck: spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=7.311,
> 	required 5, BAYES_00 -0.75, DKIM_SIGNED 0.10,
> 	HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS 0.00, KAM_INFOUSMEBIZ 0.75,
> 	KAM_MX4 1.00, KAM_VERY_BLACK_DBL 5.00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.00,
> 	RP_MATCHES_RCVD -3.10, SPF_PASS -0.00, T_DKIM_INVALID 0.01,
> 	URIBL_BLACK 1.70, URIBL_DBL_SPAM 2.50, URIBL_SBL_A 0.10)
> X-GPC-MailScanner-SpamScore: sssssss
>
> Mostly due to the KAM rules. See
> <http://www.pccc.com/downloads/SpamAssassin/contrib/KAM.cf>.
>