{Spam?} Obvious spam getting through

[Mark Sapiro]

On 12/14/2016 11:03 AM, Sterling Chavis wrote:
> The other day I started to get slammed with spam. SpamAssassin was doing
> a very good job before that, and is still catching many. Couldthey be
> spoofing the X-Mailscanner headers to bypass my mailscan rules? Here is
> an example of the ones that are getting through:


Interesting. Your message to the list got blocked as spam by my MailScanner.

X-GPC-MailScanner-SpamCheck: spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=7.311,
	required 5, BAYES_00 -0.75, DKIM_SIGNED 0.10,
	HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS 0.00, KAM_INFOUSMEBIZ 0.75,
	KAM_MX4 1.00, KAM_VERY_BLACK_DBL 5.00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.00,
	RP_MATCHES_RCVD -3.10, SPF_PASS -0.00, T_DKIM_INVALID 0.01,
	URIBL_BLACK 1.70, URIBL_DBL_SPAM 2.50, URIBL_SBL_A 0.10)
X-GPC-MailScanner-SpamScore: sssssss

Mostly due to the KAM rules. See
<http://www.pccc.com/downloads/SpamAssassin/contrib/KAM.cf>.

-- 
Mark Sapiro <mark at msapiro.net>        The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, California    better use your sense - B. Dylan