Mailscanner initial Setup help

[Heino Backhaus]

Hi,

maybe this could be your solution:

Postfix supports instances. So if you configure one instance on server A
and B to receive the mails and forward them to the Mailscanner
and another instance on server A and B to receive the mails from
Mailscanner an store them in the users mailboxes?

http://www.postfix.org/MULTI_INSTANCE_README.html
https://www.mailscanner.info/postfix/


------------------------------snip------------------------


    Why multiple Postfix instances

Postfix is a general-purpose mail system that can be configured to serve
a variety of needs. Examples of Postfix applications are:

  *

    Local mail submission for shell users and system processes.

  *

    Incoming (MX host) email from the Internet.

  *

    Outbound mail relay for a corporate network.

  *

    Authenticated submission for roaming users.

  *

    *Before/after content-filter mail. *

--------------------------------snap----------------------------

Mit freundlichen Gruessen

H. Backhaus 

Fink-Computer Systeme
Heggrabenstr. 9, 35435 Wettenberg
Email: heino.backhaus at fink-computer.de
Web: www.fink-computer.de
Fax: +49-641-98444638
Fon: +49-641-98444640
UST-ID: DE151040770
HRB: 2143 Gießen
GF: Fredi Fink

"In retrospect it becomes clear that hindsight is definitely overrated!"
  
  -Alfred E. Neumann

Am 08.12.2016 um 16:13 schrieb Manuel Kälin:
> Hi
>
> Yes, we need this second solution with incoming and outgoing direct
> trom the final hosts.
> Have you set this up with postfix and how did you forward the mails?
> As files or something like smarthost?
>
> Manuel
>
>
>     ----- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -----
>     Von:
>     "MailScanner Discussion" <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
>
>     An:
>     "MailScanner Discussion" <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
>     Cc:
>
>     Gesendet:
>     Thu, 8 Dec 2016 10:03:38 -0500
>     Betreff:
>     Re: Mailscanner initial Setup help
>
>
>     That's my solution as well. All the mail comes in to the central
>     scanning server and is then forwarded on to the final
>     destinations. The
>     model where the final delivery servers receive the mail, forward
>     it to a
>     central scanner, and then receive the results, is much harder to
>     set up.
>     In the first stage you don't want the server to be the final delivery
>     host, while in the second you do.
>
>     Peter
>
>
>     On 12/08/2016 08:42 AM, Heino Backhaus wrote:
>     > I think I would prefer to receive the mails with Mailscanner,
>     check them
>     > and forward them to Server A or B.
>
>
>     -- 
>     MailScanner mailing list
>     mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
>     http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>
>
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20161209/7257dd19/attachment.html>