Avast anyone?

[Tracy Greggs]

Steve:

I am not using the Sanesecurity signatures and you have a valid point that I should be, but it does seem like clamd used to be a lot better "out of the box" than it is now.   One would think that since Cisco took it over it would get better but it appears they are not doing a lot with it.

I have heard everything about FPROT from it sucks bad to its great, so I am a little hesitant to buy it.  Anyone can feel free to chime in on that.

Tracy


-----Original Message-----
From: MailScanner [mailto:mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info] On Behalf Of Steve Basford
Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2015 12:00 PM
To: MailScanner Discussion
Subject: RE: Avast anyone?


On Wed, December 23, 2015 5:52 pm, Tracy Greggs wrote:

> Clamd is missing a lot of junk that Sophos free is catching but I am
> trying to come up with some consensus on the best paid for AV scanner
> that will work with MailScanner.

When you say Clamd is missing a lot... is this just the official signatures, or are you using the add-on Sanesecurity ClamAV signatures.

If you are using Sanesecurity sigs make sure you use;

badmacro.ndb
phish.ndb
rogue.hdb
foxhole_filename.cdb
foxhole_generic.cdb

Email me off-list if you want to discuss.

Cheers,

Steve
Web : sanesecurity.com
Blog: sanesecurity.blogspot.com



--
MailScanner mailing list
mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
http://lists.mailscanner.info/listinfo/mailscanner


--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.