Treat Invalid Watermarks with No Sender as Spam

[Shawn Iverson]

Setting to a low score has helped immensely.  Messages are still getting caught by the other algorithms while allowing legit emails through.
 
I will make a feature request, though.
 
It appears in the MailScanner code that when Treat Invalid Watermarks with No Sender As Spam equals anything spam or higher, further rule processing is halted.  This is taking precedence over whitelisting/blacklisting and probably should not.

 
Shawn Iverson
Rush County Schools
District Technology Coordinator
iversons at rushville.k12.in.us
>>> "Shawn Iverson" <IversonS at rushville.k12.in.us> 2/26/2014 7:02 PM >>>
Just set a numeric...will observe and see what happens.

 
Shawn Iverson
Rush County Schools
District Technology Coordinator
iversons at rushville.k12.in.us
>>> Kevin Miller <Kevin_Miller at ci.juneau.ak.us> 2/26/2014 6:48 PM >>>
> When I disable the Treat Invalid Watermarks With No Sender as Spam, the messages do pass through just fine.

What happens when you assign it a numeric value?

...Kevin
--
Kevin Miller
Network/email Administrator, CBJ MIS Dept.
155 South Seward Street
Juneau, Alaska 99801
Phone: (907) 586-0242, Fax: (907) 586-4500
Registered Linux User No: 307357 


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by 
E.F.A. Project ( http://www.efa-project.org ), and is believed to be clean.


--
This message has been scanned by E.F.A. Project and is believed to be clean.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20140227/b5927d85/attachment.html