Disappearing email - could be OT

Alex Neuman alex at vidadigital.com.pa
Mon Feb 11 21:53:41 GMT 2013


There's a system-wide procmailrc file, and there are individual .procmailrc
files for different users. Check the man page for details.

On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Steve Campbell <campbell at cnpapers.com>wrote:

>  Nope. Different senders from the same domain come through fine. I can't
> say whether different senders to the same recipient varies any.
>
> We actually receive emails from the same server (with the same IP) that go
> through normally from other addresses of that domain.
>
> Which procmailrc file are you referring to? I don't have any installed
> under any user.
>
> Thanks, Alex
>
> steve
>
>
> On 2/11/2013 2:36 PM, Alex Neuman wrote:
>
> Could be a .procmailrc issue. Does it happen to *all* e-mails, regardless
> of recipient?
>
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Steve Campbell <campbell at cnpapers.com>wrote:
>
>> I'm seeing a problem from a couple of my servers. I have a primary
>> server for one of our domains, but I see emails coming through a
>> secondary server for this domain. The email that gets sent through the
>> secondary is relayed to the primary just fine.
>>
>> The problem is that the primary accepts the email and then disappears. I
>> see a line in my sendmail logs like the following:
>>
>> On the secondary:
>> sendmail[17339]: r1BGGT8J017339: from=<xxxxxx at yyyyy.
>> com>, size=0, class=0, nrcpts=1, proto=ESMTP, daemon=MTA,
>> relay=173-219-91-250.s
>> ta.suddenlink.net [173.219.91.250] (may be forged)
>>
>> On the primary (relayed from the secondary above):
>> sendmail[31249]: r1BGGZCZ031249: from=<debbie at kcprc.com>, size=0,
>> class=0, nrcpts=1, proto=SMTP, daemon=MTA,
>> relay=mailserver1.cnpapers.net [10.0.0.103]
>>
>> The logs above are for the same message. This is the only entries I see
>> for this email in both logs. The email isn't delivered, logged through
>> Mailscanner, and doesn't exist in the mqueue or mqueue.in directory.
>>
>> Has anyone seen this type of problem before? How did it get solved? Any
>> reason to believe there's a problem in  the processing database and how
>> do I discover this?
>>
>> thanks
>>
>> steve campbell
>>
>> Thanks for any
>> --
>> MailScanner mailing list
>> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
>> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>>
>> Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting
>>
>> Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!
>>
>
>
>
>  --
>
> --
>
> Alex Neuman van der Hans
> Reliant Technologies / Vida Digital
> http://vidadigital.com.pa/
>
> +507-6781-9505
> +507-832-6725
> +1-440-253-9789 (USA)
>
> Follow @AlexNeuman on Twitter
> http://facebook.com/vidadigital
>
>
> -- So-called "legal disclaimers" are not legally binding, so don't bother.
> A cute graphic saying "save the planet, don't print this" can potentially
> create more CO2, not less, so don't bother either.
>
>
>
> --
> MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>
> Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting
>
> Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!
>
>


-- 

--

Alex Neuman van der Hans
Reliant Technologies / Vida Digital
http://vidadigital.com.pa/

+507-6781-9505
+507-832-6725
+1-440-253-9789 (USA)

Follow @AlexNeuman on Twitter
http://facebook.com/vidadigital


-- So-called "legal disclaimers" are not legally binding, so don't bother.
A cute graphic saying "save the planet, don't print this" can potentially
create more CO2, not less, so don't bother either.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20130211/440a65eb/attachment.html 


More information about the MailScanner mailing list