Filter by IP

[Alex Neuman]

I would try "store" instead of "delete" at least while we're testing.
That way you can get stuff back.

On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Sampson, Aaron <Sampson at p2sol.com> wrote:
> To: *@allow.domain1.com deliver header "X-Spam-Status: No"
>
> To: *@allow.domain2.com deliver header "X-Spam-Status: No"
>
> From: 192.168.xxx.xxx delete
>
> From: 192.168.xxx.xxx delete
>
> From: 192.168.xxx.xxx delete
>
> FromOrTo: default deliver header "X-Spam-Status: No"
>
>
>
> Tried this with and without adding the deliver header “X-Spam-Status: No”
>
>
>
>
>
> From: mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info
> [mailto:mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info] On Behalf Of John Clancy
> Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2012 8:33 AM
>
>
> To: MailScanner discussion
> Subject: Re: Filter by IP
>
>
>
> I'm not an expert by any means but perhaps doing an 'od -c' on the file and
> posting it here might help someone to spot the problem.
>
>
>
> JC
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
> From: Sampson, Aaron
>
> To: MailScanner discussion
>
> Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2012 2:15 PM
>
> Subject: RE: Filter by IP
>
>
>
> No it was created on UNIX on the e-mail server
>
>
>
> From: mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info
> [mailto:mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info] On Behalf Of Steve
> Campbell
> Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2012 7:27 AM
> To: mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> Subject: Re: Filter by IP
>
>
>
> This isn't a DOS, instead of a UNIX file, perhaps? Was it created and
> modified on the server or did you copy it from a Windows machine? Do you
> need to run dos2unix on it?
>
> steve campbell
>
> On 9/19/2012 3:01 PM, Steve Campbell wrote:
>
> Are you certain you didn't type ";" instead of ":" in you rule file? It sort
> of indicates that one of your lines needs that ":" in it
>
> steve campbell
>
> On 9/19/2012 2:25 PM, Sampson, Aaron wrote:
>
> I did make sure that the capitalization was the same through it all and that
> everything was spaced out the same as well, still got the same error
> message.  Did discover that everything seemed to be working properly with
> Mail Scanner until I attempted to send out an e-mail from one of the domains
> that I had listed.  Once that e-mail attempted to go through the system the
> syntax error appeared.
>
>
>
> From: mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info
> [mailto:mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info] On Behalf Of Martin
> Hepworth
> Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2012 10:47 AM
> To: MailScanner discussion
> Subject: Re: Filter by IP
>
>
>
> have you made sure there no tab's in that ruleset.
> check out the examples in the examples dir and here.
>
> http://wiki.mailscanner.info/doku.php?id=documentation:configuration:rulesets:examples&s=rules
>
> yes you'll need the default entry , try making sure the capitalisasion is
> consistent with the examples as welll.
>
> To: @domain1.com deliver
> To: @domain2.com deliver
> From: ip.address        store
> FromOrTo: default       deliver
>
> --
> Martin Hepworth, CISSP
> Oxford, UK
>
> On 19 September 2012 16:00, Sampson, Aaron <Sampson at p2sol.com> wrote:
>
> Alex,
>
> So I tried out your suggestion and put in a a ruleset in the non-spam
> actions. rules that read
> to: *@domain1.com deliver
> to: *@domain2.com deliver
> from: ip.address        store
> and then when that did not work added
> fromorTo: default       deliver
>
> Still did not work and all e-mails coming into the company were lost (dang
> it) and I kept getting an error message saying   Syntax error in "header"
> action in spam actions,
> missing ":" in etc/MailScanner/rules/non.spam.rules
>
> We have checked and rechecked the rule-set pattern to see if we missed
> something and have tried a few things and nothing has worked so far.  We
> would like to not have to set up an additional smtp server to take care of
> this issue so any additional thoughts would be great, or let me know if you
> need/want any additional information
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info
> [mailto:mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info] On Behalf Of Alex Neuman
> Sent: Monday, September 17, 2012 12:41 PM
> To: MailScanner discussion
> Subject: Re: Filter by IP
>
> You can probably add the test server's IP to the spam whitelist, then add a
> "non-spam actions" ruleset that says something like:
>
> To:allowed.domain.com deliver
> To:allowed2.domain.com deliver
> From:xx.xx.xx.xx store
>
> That way, the first two domains "hit" and "deliver" the e-mails, while
> anything else from the test server will be "stored" - you could use "delete"
> but just in case use "store" so you can release them if necessary.
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Sampson, Aaron <Sampson at p2sol.com> wrote:
>> I am running Centos 6 with Postfix/mailscanner 4.84.5 with Spam
>> Assassin and Clamd and I have a Test server that I am trying to
>> prevent from e-mailing anyone outside 2 certain domains.  I have been
>> trying to figure out the best way to set this up so that it does not
>> interfere with the production servers or regular e-mails.  But not really
>> clear on the best way to set this up.
>>
>> I thought about trying to put something in whitelist.rules but want to
>> have a clear plan of attack before I try anything to prevent
>> disruption of normal e-mails.
>>
>>
>>
>> Wanting to do something like
>>
>> When From: ip.tst.srv.add           Only Allow to send to: our.domain.com
>> &
>> this domain.com (and block anything not to that domain)
>>
>>
>>
>> Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Aaron Sampson
>>
>> IT Department
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> MailScanner mailing list
>> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
>> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>>
>> Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting
>>
>> Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> --
>
> Alex Neuman van der Hans
> Reliant Technologies / Vida Digital
> http://vidadigital.com.pa/
>
> +507-6781-9505
> +507-832-6725
> +1-440-253-9789 (USA)
>
> Follow @AlexNeuman on Twitter
> http://facebook.com/vidadigital
>
>
> -- So-called "legal disclaimers" are not legally binding, so don't bother. A
> cute graphic saying "save the planet, don't print this" can potentially
> create more CO2, not less, so don't bother either.
> --
> MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>
> Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting
>
> Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!
> --
> MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>
> Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting
>
> Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> --
> MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>
> Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting
>
> Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!
>
>
> --
> MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>
> Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting
>
> Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!
>



-- 

--

Alex Neuman van der Hans
Reliant Technologies / Vida Digital
http://vidadigital.com.pa/

+507-6781-9505
+507-832-6725
+1-440-253-9789 (USA)

Follow @AlexNeuman on Twitter
http://facebook.com/vidadigital


-- So-called "legal disclaimers" are not legally binding, so don't
bother. A cute graphic saying "save the planet, don't print this" can
potentially create more CO2, not less, so don't bother either.