Problem messages when spam checks enabled

Stephen Cox stephencoxmail at
Thu Nov 8 08:32:50 GMT 2012

On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Neil <nwilson123 at> wrote:

> I've checked on a working system(Centos 6.3 with
> MailScanner-4.84.5-2 and postfix-2.6.6-2.2.el6_1.x86_64) and compared
> it to the same file on my problematic system and the file is the same
> so I still can't work out why this hasn't happened to my installs
> before, I've also compared the postfix filenames on both systems and
> both of them are 11 characters long.
Is there a difference in the output of MailScanner -v of these systems?

> Anyway, thanks for your assistance. What is the danger/harm in running
> in non taint mode?

It is less secure.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...

More information about the MailScanner mailing list