ka at pacific.net
Tue Apr 10 22:31:19 IST 2012
On 4/10/2012 4:09 PM, Peter Bonivart wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 10:56 PM, Ken Anderson<ka at pacific.net> wrote:
>> After years of MailScanner, a 'light' solution does sounds good though..
> Do you really have that much problems? I've been a MailScanner user
> for about 9 years running multiple installations of varying size and
> had almost zero problems during this whole time.
I have had very few problems too. That doesn't make MailScanner a
'light' solution though. Being a bit 'fat' doesn't make it a bad
solution, either. MailScanner is awesome!
>> From what I can deduce from this mailing list those who have problems
> have Postfix (nice but not a good fit for MailScanner) and/or updates
> everything on their production systems without testing it first.
More information about the MailScanner