Postfix reject_unverified_recipient question

[Peter Ong]

That's a great idea. I'll do that. Thanks.

p

----- Original Message -----

> From: "Glenn Steen" <glenn.steen at gmail.com>
> To: "MailScanner discussion" <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 7:35:18 AM
> Subject: Re: Postfix reject_unverified_recipient question
> 
> For testing, simply create a mailbox with a vanishingly small quota on
> some destination system, then ... exceed the "warning level"...;-)
> Cheers
> 
> 
> 
> Den 30 nov 2010 16.04, "Peter Ong" < peter.ong at hypermediasystems.com >
> skrev:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> 
> > From: "Glenn Steen" < glenn.steen at gmail.com >
> 
> > And did you verify t... Yes, I verified it quite extensively.
> 
> ( http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_VERIFICATION_README.html )
> The unverified_recipient_reject_code was confusing in this regard when
> I read it at first. But upon closer examination in Postfix 2.6 there
> is an unverified_recipient_defer_code which clued me into maybe that
> "reject" was supposed to be modified. At first, I feared that it was
> going to unconditionally reply 5xx to anything even for lesser
> offenses. But now that I see the "defer" version, I'm quite convinced
> it's okay to change it to 550.
> 
> After the change, I've tested it and it works. However, I am unable to
> create a test situation where the final destination server would reply
> in the 4xx or less. But I think it's working now. Thanks Glenn and
> everyone.
> 
> 
> 
> p
> --
> MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mai. ..
> 
> 
> -- 
> MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
> 
> Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting
> 
> Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!