Postfix reject_unverified_recipient question

Glenn Steen glenn.steen at gmail.com
Tue Nov 30 15:35:18 GMT 2010


For testing, simply create a mailbox with a vanishingly small quota on some
destination system, then ... exceed the "warning level"...;-)
Cheers

Den 30 nov 2010 16.04, "Peter Ong" <peter.ong at hypermediasystems.com> skrev:


----- Original Message -----

> From: "Glenn Steen" <glenn.steen at gmail.com>

> And did you verify t...
Yes, I verified it quite extensively.

(http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_VERIFICATION_README.html)
The unverified_recipient_reject_code was confusing in this regard when I
read it at first. But upon closer examination in Postfix 2.6 there is an
unverified_recipient_defer_code which clued me into maybe that "reject" was
supposed to be modified. At first, I feared that it was going to
unconditionally reply 5xx to anything even for lesser offenses. But now that
I see the "defer" version, I'm quite convinced it's okay to change it to
550.

After the change, I've tested it and it works. However, I am unable to
create a test situation where the final destination server would reply in
the 4xx or less. But I think it's working now. Thanks Glenn and everyone.


p
-- 
MailScanner mailing list
mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
http://lists.mailscanner.info/mai...
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20101130/009f36ac/attachment.html


More information about the MailScanner mailing list