MailScanner performance issues

[Martin Hepworth]

you can do in MS and SA running it on on the commandling to see if you can
replicate the speed issues. (the debug lines in the startup).

I'd also check if anythings the URIRBL's, Razor and Pyzor in SA make sure
they are still running OK.(could be if you're running the URIRBL tests then
spamhaus have greylisted you if you've turned them off or running the paid
for feed).


-- 
Martin Hepworth
Oxford, UK


On 12 November 2010 06:55, Zaeem Arshad <zaeem.arshad at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 8:26 PM, Martin Hepworth <maxsec at gmail.com> wrote:
> > do you :
> >
> > reject invalid recipients on the incoming postfix
> >
> Yes.
>
> > only run a few RBL's in Spamassassin?
> No RBLs in SpamAssassin. All RBL checks are run in postfix
>
> >
> > run a local caching nameserver?
>
> Yes.
>
> >
> > looked at the tuning/performance stuff in the wiki for clues?
>
> Yes. Infact, I have been using MailScanner for a high volume site
> (6million emails per day) for over a year now without any problems. Is
> there any way to debug how much time each MailScanner step is taking?
>
>
> Regards
>
> Zaeem
> --
> MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>
> Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting
>
> Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20101112/eabf54db/attachment.html