Alex Broens ms-list at alexb.ch
Thu Jun 10 11:28:28 IST 2010

On 2010-06-10 12:00, Peter Farrow wrote:
> I have no problems with Sorbs, used it for many years processing millions of 
> emails a month.
> The rule to the sender is, if you're listed on SORBS or any other blacklist its 
> very real and its for a reason.
> I have had no problems telling blacklisted senders how to unlist themselves, its 
> pretty simple and fairly
> black and white, if you want to email my clients: SORBS is one the blacklists 
> you must not be on.
> If they are on it, it becomes a revenue opportunity to help them get off of it.  
> Usually its one of the following:
> 1)They have sent spam and been caught red handed either because they have a weak 
> server config or they actually send spam
> 2)They are on a dynamic IP which was used for spam before, which is the fault of 
> the ISP for letting it happen
> 3)Their servers ISP they relay through is blacklisted, because it sent lots of 
> spam and the ISP did nothing about it.
> There are no excuses here, and SORBS is a good blacklist,  if you have trouble 
> with SORBS it generally means your
> clients senders are on crappy ISPs that need to sort themselves out or start 
> taking spam seriously

how many users do you cater for? only regional mail?

More information about the MailScanner mailing list