Per domains / per email ID wise scanning in MailScanner
sonidhaval at gmail.com
Fri Aug 20 13:01:01 IST 2010
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Martin Hepworth <maxsec at gmail.com> wrote:
> Sure, have a look in the wiki. Search on the word 'overloading' for some
> wonderful things you can do with rulesets.
> I'd be careful of just doing domain wise as many spam have
> from:fred at domain.com <from%3Afred at domain.com> and to:fred at domain.com<to%3Afred at domain.com>to try and get around domain level whitelists.
Can we use "To: @123.com yes" to scan all emails instead of mentioning all
email IDs of that domain?
> Martin Hepworth
> Oxford, UK
> On 20 August 2010 12:23, Dhaval Soni <sonidhaval at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Dear All,
>> We have one option in MailScanner.conf file which is "Scan Messages =yes /
>> no". This will scan all incoming emails if yes is set otherwise not. Now
>> suppose, If Scan Messages = %rules-dir%/scan.messages.rules set with default
>> = no and it contains all email IDs which are required to filter via
>> mailscanner. So my question is that, can we add whole domain instead of
>> email IDs in %rules-dir%/scan.messages.rules file for scanning ?
>> I am using MailScanner 4.79, Centos 5.5 with sendmail.
>> Let me update, if required more information.
>> Thank you,
>> Kind regards,
>> Dhaval Soni
>> Red Hat Certified Architect
>> ID: 804 007 900 325 939
>> M: +91-9662029620
>> MailScanner mailing list
>> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
>> Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting
>> Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!
> MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting
> Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!
Red Hat Certified Architect
ID: 804 007 900 325 939
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the MailScanner