MailScanner --lint Question

Steve Freegard steve.freegard at fsl.com
Mon Sep 21 08:03:39 IST 2009


Mike Wallace wrote:
> I have an existing MailScanner box running 4.77.10 and when I run
> MailScanner --lint is get the following for virus checking:
> 
> MailScanner.conf says "Virus Scanners = clamd"
> Found these virus scanners installed: clamd
> ===========================================================================
> Filename Checks: Windows/DOS Executable (1 eicar.com)
> Other Checks: Found 1 problems
> Virus and Content Scanning: Starting
> Clamd::INFECTED:: Eicar-Test-Signature :: ./1/
> Clamd::INFECTED:: Eicar-Test-Signature :: ./1/eicar.com
> Virus Scanning: Clamd found 2 infections
> Infected message 1 came from 10.1.1.1
> Virus Scanning: Found 2 viruses
> ===========================================================================
> 
> On a new box running 4.78.15 I get the following:
> 
> MailScanner.conf says "Virus Scanners = clamd"
> Found these virus scanners installed: clamd
> ===========================================================================
> Filename Checks: Windows/DOS Executable (1 eicar.com)
> Other Checks: Found 1 problems
> Virus and Content Scanning: Starting
> Clamd::INFECTED:: Eicar-Test-Signature :: ./1/eicar.com
> Virus Scanning: Clamd found 1 infections
> Infected message 1 came from 10.1.1.1
> Virus Scanning: Found 1 viruses
> ===========================================================================
> 
> 
> Both boxes are identical hardware running CentOS 5.3 with clam installed
> from rpmforge.
> 
> Which one is correct? Or are both correct and don't worry about the
> difference?
> 

Technically - both are correct.  I suspect that you have different
settings for:

ClamAV Full Message Scan = yes

Between the two systems which accounts for the difference.  Personally I
would enable this option on the new box.

Regards,
Steve.


More information about the MailScanner mailing list