MailScanner --lint Question
Steve Freegard
steve.freegard at fsl.com
Mon Sep 21 08:03:39 IST 2009
Mike Wallace wrote:
> I have an existing MailScanner box running 4.77.10 and when I run
> MailScanner --lint is get the following for virus checking:
>
> MailScanner.conf says "Virus Scanners = clamd"
> Found these virus scanners installed: clamd
> ===========================================================================
> Filename Checks: Windows/DOS Executable (1 eicar.com)
> Other Checks: Found 1 problems
> Virus and Content Scanning: Starting
> Clamd::INFECTED:: Eicar-Test-Signature :: ./1/
> Clamd::INFECTED:: Eicar-Test-Signature :: ./1/eicar.com
> Virus Scanning: Clamd found 2 infections
> Infected message 1 came from 10.1.1.1
> Virus Scanning: Found 2 viruses
> ===========================================================================
>
> On a new box running 4.78.15 I get the following:
>
> MailScanner.conf says "Virus Scanners = clamd"
> Found these virus scanners installed: clamd
> ===========================================================================
> Filename Checks: Windows/DOS Executable (1 eicar.com)
> Other Checks: Found 1 problems
> Virus and Content Scanning: Starting
> Clamd::INFECTED:: Eicar-Test-Signature :: ./1/eicar.com
> Virus Scanning: Clamd found 1 infections
> Infected message 1 came from 10.1.1.1
> Virus Scanning: Found 1 viruses
> ===========================================================================
>
>
> Both boxes are identical hardware running CentOS 5.3 with clam installed
> from rpmforge.
>
> Which one is correct? Or are both correct and don't worry about the
> difference?
>
Technically - both are correct. I suspect that you have different
settings for:
ClamAV Full Message Scan = yes
Between the two systems which accounts for the difference. Personally I
would enable this option on the new box.
Regards,
Steve.
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list