Betr.: Notice to ruleset not being read - MS 4.78.15-1

[Amelein at dantumadiel.eu]

>>> Op 8-9-2009 om 14:36 is door Martin Hepworth <maxsec at gmail.com> geschreven:



2009/9/8 <Amelein at dantumadiel.eu>


>>> Op 8-9-2009 om 13:36 is door <Amelein at dantumadiel.eu> geschreven:

Instead of parsing the rule file for the notice to: setting, it tries to literally send e-mail to the filename.
With MS 4.78.9-1 it gave me:
<%rules-dir@/notices.to.rules> (expanded from <%rules-dir%/notices.to.rules>): bad address syntax
after updating to 4.78.15-1 it gave me:
</etc/mailscanner/rules/notices.to.rules at fqdn> (expanded from </etc/MailScanner/rules/notices.to.rules>): unknown user: /etc/mailscanner/rules/notices.to.rules"
I have(/had) it set up so each domain has a different postmaster.
The system is FC11 which is fully patched, made it live a few hours ago.
Any suggestions on what I could have messed up or if its an actual problem with MS ?
-
Arjan
Looks like its doing the same for the postmaster rules, its putting the filename as sender e-mail adres.
-
Arjan


--
MailScanner mailing list
mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner

Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting

Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!




odd - what does" MailScanner --lint" run as the postfix user show?
-- 
Martin Hepworth
Oxford, UK
 
No errors except a missing unrar command which I just fixed.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20090908/f9ea9acc/attachment.html