Jeff A. Earickson
jaearick at colby.edu
Wed Sep 2 21:00:29 IST 2009
Yes. My last jump from 78.9 to 78.15 fixed both the "TNEF replace"
issues that a lot of people had (including me), and my earlier report
of "MailScanner: waiting for children to die: ... Process did not exit
cleanly, returned 2 with signal 0" issue. They were probably
related. 78.15 has been smooth.
Julian is probably wrapped up with beginning-of-semester stuff.
On Wed, 2 Sep 2009, Scott Silva wrote:
> Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2009 12:49:50 -0700
> From: Scott Silva <ssilva at sgvwater.com>
> Reply-To: MailScanner discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
> To: mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> Subject: Latest beta
> Do most of you consider the new beta pretty stable? Julian probably won't
> release it as stable until the first of next month since the first of this
> month is already gone by.
More information about the MailScanner