"Problem Messages" - what's happening?

Julian Field MailScanner at ecs.soton.ac.uk
Mon May 11 18:26:47 IST 2009


I have just published 4.77.2 which will solve this problem. It does more 
error checking.

On 11/05/2009 10:28, Julian Field wrote:
>
>
> On 11/05/2009 09:44, David Lee wrote:
>> On Sun, 10 May 2009, Mark Sapiro wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 10:44:01AM +0100, Paul Hutchings wrote:
>>>> Hmm OK seeing a few of the below in my Postmaster inbox.
>>>>
>>>> Doing a grep of the logs shows this:
>>>>
>>>> May  9 17:03:19 relay postfix/cleanup[7749]: 8BE611FCC8:
>>>> message-id=<06A07D7DB16C417C8990A7FACEE37518 at Desktop>
>>>> May  9 17:09:19 relay MailScanner[7940]: Making attempt 2 at 
>>>> processing
>>>> message 8BE611FCC8.A5E8C
>>>> May  9 17:09:19 relay MailScanner[7940]: Expanding TNEF archive at
>>>> /var/spool/MailScanner/incoming/7940/8BE611FCC8.A5E8C/winmail.dat
>>> [...]
>>>> May  9 17:27:30 relay MailScanner[9522]: Warning: skipping message
>>>> 8BE611FCC8.A5E8C as it has been attempted too many times
>>>> May  9 17:27:30 relay MailScanner[9522]: Quarantined message
>>>> 8BE611FCC8.A5E8C as it caused MailScanner to crash several times
>>>> May  9 17:27:30 relay MailScanner[9522]: Saved entire message to
>>>> /var/spool/MailScanner/quarantine/20090509/8BE611FCC8.A5E8C
>>>
>>>
>>> I suspect the problem is the TNEF decoder is timing out trying to
>>> decode the TNEF (winmail.dat) part of the message. The part is likely
>>> corrupt.
>>>
>>> You could verify this by retrieving the message from the quarantine,
>>> saving the winmail.dat attachment and then trying to expand it with
>>> /usr/bin/tnef which is the default decoder.
>>
>> To confirm the problem and possible workaround: I, too, have just 
>> started seeing a tiny number of such instances.  It recurred even of 
>> quiet machines.  But I don't think it is the timeout (at least, nor 
>> directly).
>>
>> In my "MailScanner.conf" we have historically had:
>>    TNEF Expander  = internal
>>
>> Quick fix: When I switched this to use the "/usr/bin/tnef" version, 
>> the emails (rescued from quarantine and replaced into the MS inbound 
>> queue) seemed to go through OK.  I got the correct setting from a 
>> ".rpmnew" file which seems to be:
>>    TNEF Expander  = /usr/bin/tnef --maxsize=100000000
>>
>>
>> A little deeper:  When I ran them through MS in debug mode (with TNEF 
>> setting "internal") I got:
>>    In Debugging mode, not forking...
>>    Trying to setlogsock(unix)
>>    Building a message batch to scan...
>>    Have a batch of 2 messages.
>>    Can't call method "path" on an undefined value at 
>> /usr/lib/MailScanner/MailScanner/TNEF.pm line 178.
>>
>> Not the "Can't call ..." line.
>>
>> The MS run took less than four seconds.  I had initially suspected 
>> TNEF timeout, but it seems to be something different, related to the 
>> "internal" setting of "TNEF Expander".
>>
>> That 'Can't call method "path"...' doesn't appear in the "maillog" 
>> file (which, in retrospect, is a pity, because that would have been a 
>> more obvious clue to follow).
>>
>> Anyway: summary:
>>
>> 1. Problem seems to coincide with "TNEF Expander = internal".  For 
>> end-users, using "/usr/bin/tnef ..." seems to be a workaround for the 
>> moment.
>>
>> 2. For those who sometimes look a little deeper in the "why", MS in 
>> '-debug' mode seems to indicate a perl coding error which doesn't get 
>> shown in the 'maillog' file.
>>
>> Hope that helps.
>>
> Please can you send me a copy of the message that triggered the fault? 
> Zip up the raw queue file and mail it to me at 
> mailscanner at ecs.soton.ac.uk please.
>
> Jules
>

Jules

-- 
Julian Field MEng CITP CEng
www.MailScanner.info
Buy the MailScanner book at www.MailScanner.info/store
Follow me at twitter.com/JulesFM

MailScanner customisation, or any advanced system administration help?
Contact me at Jules at Jules.FM

PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC 7222 11F6 5947 1415 B654
PGP public key: http://www.jules.fm/julesfm.asc


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.



More information about the MailScanner mailing list