OT: Out of office auto-reply advice
Michael H. Warfield
mhw at WittsEnd.com
Sat Mar 21 16:38:53 GMT 2009
On Sat, 2009-03-21 at 10:25 +0000, Paul Hutchings wrote:
> I don't think any Outlook rule will help as, AFAIK, there simply isn't
> an option with Out Of Office to specify who/what it replies to, though I
> believe it will respect certain flags such as bulk/list/junk precedence
> and not reply.
> If you enable rules to send to the internet (on the Exchange server) you
> can be a bit more granular, but you have to be careful with rules
> because you can get mail loops and the likes because they aren't "smart"
> enough to only reply once.
That's part of what Precedence is used for. It's actually written up
in a BCP (Best Common Practice) somewhere.
* Never reply to a message with precedence less that 0 (they have
numerical values although most systems use string matches).
* Autoreplies must set a precedence less that 0 (typically Precedence:
bulk). AFAIK, Exchange does this.
* Never reply to a DSN.
* Never reply to a reply (which is actually redundant if the first two
rules are applied properly).
I think there were a few more. I don't have the BCP handy.
> MIRA Ltd
> Watling Street, Nuneaton, Warwickshire, CV10 0TU, England.
> Registered in England and Wales No. 402570
> VAT Registration GB 114 5409 96
Michael H. Warfield (AI4NB) | (770) 985-6132 | mhw at WittsEnd.com
/\/\|=mhw=|\/\/ | (678) 463-0932 | http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/
NIC whois: MHW9 | An optimist believes we live in the best of all
PGP Key: 0xDF1DD471 | possible worlds. A pessimist is sure of it!
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 307 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20090321/3e6b66ed/attachment.bin
More information about the MailScanner