{SPAM??} Re: Test of Mailing List

[Mike Wallace]

Yep it was the URIs.

I guess they must be doing some type of outbound spam checking.


On Jul 15, 2009, at 6:21 PM, Mike Wallace wrote:

> The funny thing is that I have never had problems in the past 2-3  
> years I have been running this configuration.
>
> I think it might be the sample URIs I was sending. So, I've changed  
> the actual URIs to see if that is the issue.
>
> 1) 	!.www_domain_com
> 2)	.www+domain+net
>
>
> Mike
>
>
>
> On Jul 15, 2009, at 1:50 PM, Alex Neuman van der Hans wrote:
>
>> You know who to call...
>> Perhaps you'd like to use a separate account (GMail, for example)  
>> for the list? Since GMail uses port 587 or 465, it shouldn't be  
>> blocked by your ISP.
>>
>> On Jul 15, 2009, at 12:39 PM, Mike Wallace wrote:
>>
>>> (due to my ISP only allowing outbound smtp through their server).
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Alex Neuman van der Hans
>> Reliant Technologies
>> +507 6781-9505
>> +507 202-1525
>> alex at rtpty.com
>> Skype: alexneuman
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> MailScanner mailing list
>> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
>> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>>
>> Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting
>>
>> Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!
>> This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by  
>> MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
>>
>
> -- 
> MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>
> Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting
>
> Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!
> This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by  
> MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
>